Sunday, July 04, 2010

Life, Liberty, And The Pursuit Of Happiness

Life, Liberty, And The Pursuit Of Happiness

Happy Independence Day!

It was 234 years ago today that America's Founding Fathers signed the Declaration of Independence. The revolutionary document written by Thomas Jefferson in 1776 went through many drafts and indeed, historians now say he even changed it by altering one key word from "subjects" to "citizens."

But one thing that never changed what was that document was all about: three inalienable rights.

Life.

Liberty.

The pursuit of Happiness.

Although the Declaration of Independence came several years before the U.S. Constitution and its subsequent Bill of Rights, that cherished parchment paved the way for the freedoms contained in the First Amendment that every American should hold dear, yet too often takes for granted: freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of the press and freedom to peaceably assemble.

Thanks to those freedoms and our inalienable rights, live theatre remains a vibrant force within our culture. With the dialogue it fosters, our society is rich. Where else, but America, would our founders enshrine the notion of Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness?
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
Every day, we must work hard to protect our freedoms.

Thankfully, the arts serve as a strong bulwark in our line of defense in protecting our freedoms. We may not always agree with the messages art conveys, but the inherent beauty within freedom of expression is that it can and often does challenge us. I shudder to think what our nation would be like if we were all required to think the same thing or only avail ourselves of government-approved press, literature, theatre, movies and television.

The arts do more than just entertain, they propel us further as a people.

Contributions from the arts and the dialogue they inspire over what it means to be an American make me extraordinarily proud to be one. I believe that the performing arts can and will continue to inspire, but only if we continue to steadfastly ensure it is allowed to do so freely.

Happy birthday, America!

This is Steve On Broadway (SOB).


In keeping with the new Federal Trade Commission (FTC) regulations that unfairly discriminate against bloggers, who are now required by law to disclose when they have received anything of value they might write about, please note that I have received nothing of value in exchange for this post.

Labels: , , , , ,

Friday, May 21, 2010

How Hair Transformed London Theatre

How Hair Transformed London Theatre

Apart from live theatre, two of my other passions in life are traveling and history.

For me, London is one of those spectacularly thrilling destinations to visit on a routine basis because it's both steeped in history and has exceptional theatre. Every now and then, those passions dovetail nicely like they did last week when I took in a performance of the current Hair revival.

While I don't think I'll ever quite get used to having to spend the equivalent of $5 simply for a stage programme (there are no complimentary Playbills to be found), better productions at least ensure that they're chock full of informative nuggets. Such is the case of the Hair programme, which describes in great detail how the earliest transfer of this show nearly 32 years ago may not have occurred at all.

The programme describes how the show first opened in London on September 27, 1968, exactly one day after the formal abolition of theatre censorship in the United Kingdom by an Act of Parliament known as the Theatres Act of 1968.

Prior to that, since 1737, the government mandated that scripts must be licensed for performance by the Lord Chamberlain's Office, which could censor virtually anything it felt was against common decency, including -- initially -- political satire. The office exercised that power forcefully, prohibiting any play "for the preservation of good manners, decorum or of the public peace."

With such strict censorship maintaining a tight grip on British norms right up through 1968, Hair could never have opened the way it did at the Shaftesbury Theatre on that September night without that Act of Parliament. Indeed, the musical's opening -- with stars Tim Curry, Elaine Paige and Paul Nicholas -- was delayed until the laws changed.

Hair forever altered the course for theatrical expression in the United Kingdom. Not only was it the first rock musical to ever freely discuss drugs and "Sodomy" on stage, but it was also the first with full frontal nudity and a mixed race cast. The show enjoyed 1,998 performances, and it only closed when the ceiling of the Shaftesbury Theatre collapsed.

And now you know the rest of the story on why Hair remains a milestone in London theatrical history.

This is Steve On Broadway (SOB).

In keeping with the new Federal Trade Commission (FTC) regulations that unfairly discriminate against bloggers, who are now required by law to disclose when they have received anything of value they might write about, please note that I have received nothing of value in exchange for this post.

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Technorati blog directory Blog Directory & Search engine
Visitor Map

Powered by FeedBurner